Also Boobs: Is This a Real Pic of Demi Lovato Topless? (NSFW) Posted by Nathan S. on 04/07/14 | Filed under Top Stories, Girls, Debates, NSFW

Earlier today I wrote a deeply personal and (perhaps) inspirational piece about men improving their health. Frankly, it was exhausting. That's about all the higher functioning portions of my brain and soul have in them. But I should probably get at least one more piece up on the site today. But what could I possibly.....

....wait, what's that? "Nude" pics of Demi Lovato have "leaked", and there's some completely meaningless aspect of those pics that I can take way too seriously? Well then, sold and sold. Boobs-related investigations are kind of my thing. Let's do this, and we'll have to start at the beginning. 

Now, I have to admit that I don't know a whole lot about Demi Lovato, other than she's a celebrity and apparently I will always click on an article that involves #CelebrityBoobs because I'm an unadvanced homo sapien. If my pop culture game is ballpark, she's a former child television star turned pop singer (Miley Cyrus-esque) who went through some substance abuse and mental problems, cleaned up, and is now the judge on a reality singing show (Britney Spears-esque). Here's a picture of her younger, wilder days: 

Fast forwarding to the present, today some pics leaked that are absolutely in the "NSFW, but not really" category. When those pics of Amber Rose's vagina came out there was no possible reaction but yep, that's Amber Rose's vagina, but these aren't so much shockingly racy pics as they are a pic of her with that dude from "That 70's Show", and one shot that's kind of bend-overy: 

(Click here for the less censored version)

Pretty straight-forward stuff, but this wouldn't be the interwebs without a conspiracy theory cropping up, more specifically around the alleged "topless" pic. Before I really break things down, let's all make sure we're working from the same source material: 

(Click here for the uncensored version)

So there's that. But as Gawker reported because they do the Lord's work over there, let's look closer. First, it's suspicious that the only topless picture in the bunch also doesn't include her face. And while those do indeed look like the general location and style of Lovato's tattoos, either her camera's so shitty the tattoos appear to be super blurred, or someone tried to draw on replications of her tattoos with Sharpie and kind of sucked at it. Which in turn raises some fascinating questions. If that is indeed a fake photo, what type of person puts that much time and effort into faking a topless celebrity picture? Think about it. If that is a fake, that means an actual person spent significant time drawing fake tattoos on someone another actual person, then that person went into the bathroom and took a topless pic of themselves and then "leaked" it. That's kind of crazy talk. Why? WHY HUMANITY WHY???????

We clearly need someone to analyze the blurry reflection in the shower door and get to the bottom of this. RefinedHype Nation, I'm looking at you. 

RefinedHype has merged with The DJBooth. It's the same articles you loved on RefinedHype, new address. For more info, check out the official announcement.