Read more: Top Stories, Features, Speak of Freedom
| Nathan S. |
I've got too much to say to fit into a comment box, but since it's an issue that obviously hits close to home, I have to weight in. First, considering the vast, vast majority of the raids were aimed to bootleggers/counterfeiters, etc., it seems to me like the gov't was going to do this raid regardless, and then thought that as long as they were at it, they might as well make the RIAA (and it's millions in lobbying $) happy and shut down some sites as well. So while it's easy for those of us for whom blogs are the center of the universe to think this was raid was entirely about us, it's important to remember that on a larger scale, it was only a small fraction of what happened. Second, I genuinely feel terrible for everyone who will lose a job over this, especially near the holiday season. With that said, some of my colleagues reactions reminds me of the "Free Weezy" movement. Let's not kid ourselves about what OnSmash was. They were a site whose traffic was almost entirely driven by illegal downloads and leaked music, and they even went so far as to re-upload videos into their own player. It's no accident they were targeted. This isn't a free speech issue, this is a financial/legal issue, so while its only natural to rally around a fallen comrade, let's be careful not to make OnSmash into something they weren't in the process. Lastly, in my talks with labels, RIAA reps etc., they seem to feel that as long as addition content is surrounding the music, they're more willing to let it slide. In other word, post a pic, a sentence and a download link and you're in trouble. Teach the audience more about their artist, spur discussion about the music, link to buy links etc, and you won't be completely safe, but you'll be safer. Obviously OnSmash is being held up as an example, and it's the RIAA's hope that a ton of small blogs will see this, get scared, decide it's not worth the trouble and shut down. Ultimately, right now we're in the wild west of online music distribution. No one knows what the law of the land is - it hasn't been created yet. We're only in the beginning stage of what is sure to be a wild ride, and if you come back tomorrow and RefinedHype's shut down, just know we'll be reloading and surveying the landscape. |
| Posted on Nov 29, 2010 |
| d-mac |
From my talks with Music Labels I know how protective they are over their music videos. They want you to watch their videos on Vevo and other channels where they generate revenue from advertising. OnSmash's mistake was taking those videos and posting them in their own player which was then wrapped in their own advertising with no money being sent back to the labels. Anyway you look at it that is theft. The argument that bloggers promote music doesnt hold water. If I were to bootleg a movie and sell it am I helping the movie industry because I am "spreading the word" about a movie? If the blogs really do hold all this power, then why do they bother to post music from popular artists? Why not make a new artist who is giving away his/her music popular? The reason is because its not the blogs that make the music popular, its very often the other way around. OnSmash will not be the last site to fall. |
| Posted on Nov 29, 2010 |
| bitcloud7 |
Ok, Brando, and Nathan. We with yall. |
| Posted on Nov 29, 2010 |
| Brando |
Understandable with both comments made by Nathan & D-Mac that OnSmash took those videos promoted by labels and reuploaded them on their own player but many of times those same videos were struck down after a while. If you're going to go after OnSmash for that then what does that say about a site such as WorldStarHipHop that does the exact same thing? |
| Posted on Nov 29, 2010 |
| Chozen |
@ d-mac it's not the other way around, where did the people discover Drake, Wiz Khalifa, Nicki Minaj, J. Cole, or any new artist that has come along in the past 4 years? It wasn't in a magazine, tv and damn sure wasn't the radio. It was on blogs and websites, all those artist where underground artist at one point and they were sending their music to blogs just like every other artist. So what now that they have major record deals, the blogs are suppose not cover them anymore? That's redundant. I was covering Drake in 2006, who was Drake back then? None of these new cats were "popular artists" when we first started covering them, so the argument of whether or not blogs promote music shouldn't even be on the table, that's already been established. |
| Posted on Nov 30, 2010 |
| AWKWORD |
Thanks for the editorial. Totally agree. More reporting here: https://bit.ly/GetYourMindRight |
| Posted on Nov 30, 2010 |
Public Enemy said it best: don’t believe the hype. Urban music and culture has found a home online, but with the explosion of new content appearing online everyday, it’s become difficult to separate what’s real with what’s just hype.
RefinedHype gathers everything that’s new in urban culture and refines it for a discriminating audience. From exclusive new music to the latest in entertainment, fashion, events and more, we give you the high quality content you demand.