Реклама

The Conspiracy Behind the Gov’t Shut Down of OnSmash

Posted by Brando on 11/29/10 | Filed under Top Stories, Features, Speak of Freedom

On Smash Shut Down
The average hip-hop fan in 2010 has a routine. He wakes up, visits his favorite hip-hop blog, interacts with fellow hip-hop fans and downloads the latest tracks from their favorite artist or discovers someone new.

That day turned absolutely sour come November 25th as ICE (Immigration & Customs Enforcement) took their hand at shutting down popular music blogs OnSmash, DaJaz1 & RapGodfathers over illegal file sharing. A few of the other torrent sites also swept up in the raids catered more towards the movie industry, counterfeit clothing & other wares according to this New York Times report.

Chuck D’s opening words from “Black Steel In The Hour of Chaos” rang true, but only for the crowd least likely to read them.

For two days it made other blogs from within the community (whether they be New Music Cartel affiliated or not) cautious and weary. Were they on the government’s secret watch list? Did they do anything to involve a giant image plastered on their domains and be forced to start anew?

As of Sunday, traffic within the hip-hop blogosphere has slowed with the major instance happening to be The Diplomats reunion concert and a slew of R&B mixtapes. Either the real noisemakers in hip-hop were stuffed with turkey, or regrouping after the megaton bomb that was Def Jam’s golden goose releasing a critically acclaimed album.

One of the major aims towards at least two of the three major music sites listed would be that each site happens to have a forum where members can virtually post any content whether it is from a leaked music video to a leaked album released days before the street date. It may be the latest effort from the Recording Industry Association of America to combat leaks but it sadly undercuts those trying to even survive in the industry to begin with.

Here’s the full list of those shutdown by the ICE’s crackdown last Thursday via Funk Flex. Notice how the three music blogs don’t even look remotely related to the others?

By directly attacking music bloggers, Homeland Security (and by a stretch the government) essentially has decided to combat wars that are not wars within U.S. soil against people who do more for the industry, for the generation of new artist than possibly the RIAA itself. It’s easy to notice that those bloggers have already gained full compliance with the RIAA via the Digital Music Copyright Act but in the eyes of this writer, it obviously was not enough.

The irony here is that form sites such as OnSmash do not openly support trading of illegal albums or music. That issue is left up to the actual members who make the posts on the forums. The only information logged under the forum’s history would be that site file happens to exist and is hosted on a third party server. The only things actually hosted on the OS server? Music videos – released in conjunction with underground artists, mainstream artists or alternative acts.

So why round up music blogs who do nothing except promote artists and new music, remixes and the like? Simple – to send a message (an unnecessary one) to the blog industry who currently has a stranglehold on everything in music.

It’s obvious enough that there’s no possible way to smuggle an MP3 or a music video since neither are technically illegal. Especially when the artists themselves contact OnSmash, Splash (founder of DaJaz1) in an attempt to gain promotion for their song, album, et al. In the grand scheme of things, those blogs will take a hit and the New Music Cartel will find itself with an undeserved target on its back but it will only make every post made on a site filled with less enthusiasm about the music and more enthusiasm about sending a message back to the government and the RIAA. The bloggers may turn into hip-hop’s most dangerous group in Dead Prez and scream “they can’t stop us all”.

The RIAA has been in a decade long war of its own with the tech savvy internet user that it has focused so much of its attention that the other areas they need to maybe keep their eyes on have gone barren. We’ve seen album sales plummet and big box stores eat up the small market that actually engaged consumers. We’ve seen record labels plop down every single dime and dollar they have on marketing one artist’ album for a giant holiday run and watch others get sucked up in a “oh, that album’s out?” vacuum (see Ne-Yo getting pushed out by Def Jam the same week Kanye West released his latest highly acclaimed album?). It’s come to a point where the small victories the RIAA can attempt to claim are pitiful lawsuits with someone who downloaded music before Steve Jobs came out with iTunes to simplify their problem.

Long ago, the RIAA used to sit up in a big high rise and dictate everything going in the industry from creation inside of a studio to the pricing at a checkout counter. With a constantly changing business model, the group decided to go to the one name that strikes fear in all of its citizens to gain a little traction and ploy.

By using that hand, the RIAA has shown that it is not only spineless but counterproductive in generating any interest for an industry that has to rely on catch lightning in a bottle tactics to string together any sort of feasible buzz. Maybe they should talk to labels that undership albums for artist who had the #1 song in the country and went double platinum with that song.

Because music blogs are the first and possible last line of defense for alerting consumers if an album is out. It’s grown to proportions that make the big networks pick up blogs just to compete. Before long, the business model will change once more with artist employing “Prince” tactics by charging subscription fees to their sites for fans to receive new music and try to undercut the blogs all together.
It’s a monopoly, but the capital side will soon turn your favorite MP3 into prohibition era booze. I don’t think anyone in the blog game wants to turn into a modern day Enoch “Nucky” Thompson but with the way things are going, somebody may have to step up. Otherwise the freedoms we’ve enjoyed for generations will soon become the same freedoms that get us caught up in fines and sanctions.

All for the love of music.

Read more: Top Stories, Features, Speak of Freedom


Member Comments

Nathan S.
Nathan S.
I've got too much to say to fit into a comment box, but since it's an issue that obviously hits close to home, I have to weight in.

First, considering the vast, vast majority of the raids were aimed to bootleggers/counterfeiters, etc., it seems to me like the gov't was going to do this raid regardless, and then thought that as long as they were at it, they might as well make the RIAA (and it's millions in lobbying $) happy and shut down some sites as well. So while it's easy for those of us for whom blogs are the center of the universe to think this was raid was entirely about us, it's important to remember that on a larger scale, it was only a small fraction of what happened.

Second, I genuinely feel terrible for everyone who will lose a job over this, especially near the holiday season. With that said, some of my colleagues reactions reminds me of the "Free Weezy" movement.

Let's not kid ourselves about what OnSmash was. They were a site whose traffic was almost entirely driven by illegal downloads and leaked music, and they even went so far as to re-upload videos into their own player. It's no accident they were targeted. This isn't a free speech issue, this is a financial/legal issue, so while its only natural to rally around a fallen comrade, let's be careful not to make OnSmash into something they weren't in the process.

Lastly, in my talks with labels, RIAA reps etc., they seem to feel that as long as addition content is surrounding the music, they're more willing to let it slide. In other word, post a pic, a sentence and a download link and you're in trouble. Teach the audience more about their artist, spur discussion about the music, link to buy links etc, and you won't be completely safe, but you'll be safer.

Obviously OnSmash is being held up as an example, and it's the RIAA's hope that a ton of small blogs will see this, get scared, decide it's not worth the trouble and shut down.

Ultimately, right now we're in the wild west of online music distribution. No one knows what the law of the land is - it hasn't been created yet. We're only in the beginning stage of what is sure to be a wild ride, and if you come back tomorrow and RefinedHype's shut down, just know we'll be reloading and surveying the landscape.

Posted on Nov 29, 2010
d-mac
d-mac
From my talks with Music Labels I know how protective they are over their music videos. They want you to watch their videos on Vevo and other channels where they generate revenue from advertising. OnSmash's mistake was taking those videos and posting them in their own player which was then wrapped in their own advertising with no money being sent back to the labels. Anyway you look at it that is theft.

The argument that bloggers promote music doesnt hold water. If I were to bootleg a movie and sell it am I helping the movie industry because I am "spreading the word" about a movie? If the blogs really do hold all this power, then why do they bother to post music from popular artists? Why not make a new artist who is giving away his/her music popular? The reason is because its not the blogs that make the music popular, its very often the other way around.

OnSmash will not be the last site to fall.

Posted on Nov 29, 2010
bitcloud7
bitcloud7
Ok, Brando, and Nathan. We with yall.

Posted on Nov 29, 2010
Brando
Brando
Understandable with both comments made by Nathan & D-Mac that OnSmash took those videos promoted by labels and reuploaded them on their own player but many of times those same videos were struck down after a while.

If you're going to go after OnSmash for that then what does that say about a site such as WorldStarHipHop that does the exact same thing?

Posted on Nov 29, 2010
Chozen
@ d-mac it's not the other way around, where did the people discover Drake, Wiz Khalifa, Nicki Minaj, J. Cole, or any new artist that has come along in the past 4 years? It wasn't in a magazine, tv and damn sure wasn't the radio. It was on blogs and websites, all those artist where underground artist at one point and they were sending their music to blogs just like every other artist. So what now that they have major record deals, the blogs are suppose not cover them anymore? That's redundant.

I was covering Drake in 2006, who was Drake back then? None of these new cats were "popular artists" when we first started covering them, so the argument of whether or not blogs promote music shouldn't even be on the table, that's already been established.

Posted on Nov 30, 2010
AWKWORD
Thanks for the editorial. Totally agree. More reporting here: https://bit.ly/GetYourMindRight

Posted on Nov 30, 2010


Existing User Login:               Forgot your Password?
 
line
New Users - Register to Comment



By Registering you accept our Ts&Cs    
Please login or Become a Member!

 


Remember Me       Forgot your Password?
line

What is Refined Hype?

line

Public Enemy said it best: don’t believe the hype. Urban music and culture has found a home online, but with the explosion of new content appearing online everyday, it’s become difficult to separate what’s real with what’s just hype.

RefinedHype gathers everything that’s new in urban culture and refines it for a discriminating audience. From exclusive new music to the latest in entertainment, fashion, events and more, we give you the high quality content you demand.

more